The American Scholar

 

 

 

 

 

                   An Oration delivered before the Phi Beta Kappa Society, at Cambridge, August 31, 1837

 

                   Mr. President and Gentlemen,

 

                   I greet you on the re-commencement of our literary year. Our anniversary is one of hope, and, perhaps, not enough of

                   labor. We do not meet for games of strength or skill, for the recitation of histories, tragedies, and odes, like the ancient

                   Greeks; for parliaments of love and poesy, like the Troubadours; nor for the advancement of science, like our

                   cotemporaries in the British and European capitals. Thus far, our holiday has been simply a friendly sign of the survival

                   of the love of letters amongst a people too busy to give to letters any more. As such, it is precious as the sign of an

                   indestructible instinct. Perhaps the time is already come, when it ought to be, and will be, something else; when the

                   sluggard intellect of this continent will look from under its iron lids, and fill the postponed expectation of the world with

                   something better than the exertions of mechanical skill. Our day of dependence, our long apprenticeship to the learning

                   of other lands, draws to a close. The millions, that around us are rushing into life, cannot always be fed on the sere

                   remains of foreign harvests. Events, actions arise, that must be sung, that will sing themselves. Who can doubt, that

                   poetry will revive and lead in a new age, as the star in the constellation Harp, which now flames in our zenith,

                   astronomers announce, shall one day be the pole-star for a thousand years?

 

                   In this hope, I accept the topic which not only usage, but the nature of our association, seem to prescribe to this day, —

                   the AMERICAN SCHOLAR. Year by year, we come up hither to read one more chapter of his biography. Let us inquire

                   what light new days and events have thrown on his character, and his hopes.

 

                   It is one of those fables, which, out of an unknown antiquity, convey an unlooked-for wisdom, that the gods, in the

                   beginning, divided Man into men, that he might be more helpful to himself; just as the hand was divided into fingers,

                   the better to answer its end.

 

                   The old fable covers a doctrine ever new and sublime; that there is One Man, — present to all particular men only

                   partially, or through one faculty; and that you must take the whole society to find the whole man. Man is not a farmer,

                   or a professor, or an engineer, but he is all. Man is priest, and scholar, and statesman, and producer, and soldier. In the

                   divided or social state, these functions are parcelled out to individuals, each of whom aims to do his stint of the joint

                   work, whilst each other performs his. The fable implies, that the individual, to possess himself, must sometimes return

                   from his own labor to embrace all the other laborers. But unfortunately, this original unit, this fountain of power, has

                   been so distributed to multitudes, has been so minutely subdivided and peddled out, that it is spilled into drops, and

                   cannot be gathered. The state of society is one in which the members have suffered amputation from the trunk, and

                   strut about so many walking monsters, — a good finger, a neck, a stomach, an elbow, but never a man.

 

                   Man is thus metamorphosed into a thing, into many things. The planter, who is Man sent out into the field to gather

                   food, is seldom cheered by any idea of the true dignity of his ministry. He sees his bushel and his cart, and nothing

                   beyond, and sinks into the farmer, instead of Man on the farm. The tradesman scarcely ever gives an ideal worth to his

                   work, but is ridden by the routine of his craft, and the soul is subject to dollars. The priest becomes a form; the

                   attorney, a statute-book; the mechanic, a machine; the sailor, a rope of a ship.

 

                   In this distribution of functions, the scholar is the delegated intellect. In the right state, he is, Man Thinking. In the

                   degenerate state, when the victim of society, he tends to become a mere thinker, or, still worse, the parrot of other

                   men's thinking.

 

                   In this view of him, as Man Thinking, the theory of his office is contained. Him nature solicits with all her placid, all her

                   monitory pictures; him the past instructs; him the future invites. Is not, indeed, every man a student, and do not all

                   things exist for the student's behoof? And, finally, is not the true scholar the only true master? But the old oracle said,

                   `All things have two handles: beware of the wrong one.' In life, too often, the scholar errs with mankind and forfeits his

                   privilege. Let us see him in his school, and consider him in reference to the main influences he receives.

 

                   I. The first in time and the first in importance of the influences upon the mind is that of nature. Every day, the sun;

                   and, after sunset, night and her stars. Ever the winds blow; ever the grass grows. Every day, men and women,

                   conversing, beholding and beholden. The scholar is he of all men whom this spectacle most engages. He must settle its

                   value in his mind. What is nature to him? There is never a beginning, there is never an end, to the inexplicable

                   continuity of this web of God, but always circular power returning into itself. Therein it resembles his own spirit, whose

                   beginning, whose ending, he never can find, — so entire, so boundless. Far, too, as her splendors shine, system on

                   system shooting like rays, upward, downward, without centre, without circumference, — in the mass and in the

                   particle, nature hastens to render account of herself to the mind. Classification begins. To the young mind, every thing

                   is individual, stands by itself. By and by, it finds how to join two things, and see in them one nature; then three, then

                   three thousand; and so, tyrannized over by its own unifying instinct, it goes on tying things together, diminishing

                   anomalies, discovering roots running under ground, whereby contrary and remote things cohere, and flower out from

                   one stem. It presently learns, that, since the dawn of history, there has been a constant accumulation and classifying of

                   facts. But what is classification but the perceiving that these objects are not chaotic, and are not foreign, but have a law

                   which is also a law of the human mind? The astronomer discovers that geometry, a pure abstraction of the human

                   mind, is the measure of planetary motion. The chemist finds proportions and intelligible method throughout matter;

                   and science is nothing but the finding of analogy, identity, in the most remote parts. The ambitious soul sits down

                   before each refractory fact; one after another, reduces all strange constitutions, all new powers, to their class and their

                   law, and goes on for ever to animate the last fibre of organization, the outskirts of nature, by insight.

 

                   Thus to him, to this school-boy under the bending dome of day, is suggested, that he and it proceed from one root; one

                   is leaf and one is flower; relation, sympathy, stirring in every vein. And what is that Root? Is not that the soul of his

                   soul? — A thought too bold, — a dream too wild. Yet when this spiritual light shall have revealed the law of more

                   earthly natures, — when he has learned to worship the soul, and to see that the natural philosophy that now is, is only

                   the first gropings of its gigantic hand, he shall look forward to an ever expanding knowledge as to a becoming creator.

                   He shall see, that nature is the opposite of the soul, answering to it part for part. One is seal, and one is print. Its

                   beauty is the beauty of his own mind. Its laws are the laws of his own mind. Nature then becomes to him the measure

                   of his attainments. So much of nature as he is ignorant of, so much of his own mind does he not yet possess. And, in

                   fine, the ancient precept, "Know thyself," and the modern precept, "Study nature," become at last one maxim.

 

                   II. The next great influence into the spirit of the scholar, is, the mind of the Past, — in whatever form, whether of

                   literature, of art, of institutions, that mind is inscribed. Books are the best type of the influence of the past, and perhaps

                   we shall get at the truth, — learn the amount of this influence more conveniently, — by considering their value alone.

 

                   The theory of books is noble. The scholar of the first age received into him the world around; brooded thereon; gave it

                   the new arrangement of his own mind, and uttered it again. It came into him, life; it went out from him, truth. It came

                   to him, short-lived actions; it went out from him, immortal thoughts. It came to him, business; it went from him,

                   poetry. It was dead fact; now, it is quick thought. It can stand, and it can go. It now endures, it now flies, it now

                   inspires. Precisely in proportion to the depth of mind from which it issued, so high does it soar, so long does it sing.

 

                   Or, I might say, it depends on how far the process had gone, of transmuting life into truth. In proportion to the

                   completeness of the distillation, so will the purity and imperishableness of the product be. But none is quite perfect. As

                   no air-pump can by any means make a perfect vacuum, so neither can any artist entirely exclude the conventional, the

                   local, the perishable from his book, or write a book of pure thought, that shall be as efficient, in all respects, to a remote

                   posterity, as to cotemporaries, or rather to the second age. Each age, it is found, must write its own books; or rather,

                   each generation for the next succeeding. The books of an older period will not fit this.

 

                   Yet hence arises a grave mischief. The sacredness which attaches to the act of creation, — the act of thought, — is

                   transferred to the record. The poet chanting, was felt to be a divine man: henceforth the chant is divine also. The

                   writer was a just and wise spirit: henceforward it is settled, the book is perfect; as love of the hero corrupts into

                   worship of his statue. Instantly, the book becomes noxious: the guide is a tyrant. The sluggish and perverted mind of

                   the multitude, slow to open to the incursions of Reason, having once so opened, having once received this book, stands

                   upon it, and makes an outcry, if it is disparaged. Colleges are built on it. Books are written on it by thinkers, not by Man

                   Thinking; by men of talent, that is, who start wrong, who set out from accepted dogmas, not from their own sight of

                   principles. Meek young men grow up in libraries, believing it their duty to accept the views, which Cicero, which Locke,

                   which Bacon, have given, forgetful that Cicero, Locke, and Bacon were only young men in libraries, when they wrote

                   these books.

 

                   Hence, instead of Man Thinking, we have the bookworm. Hence, the book-learned class, who value books, as such; not

                   as related to nature and the human constitution, but as making a sort of Third Estate with the world and the soul.

                   Hence, the restorers of readings, the emendators, the bibliomaniacs of all degrees.

 

                   Books are the best of things, well used; abused, among the worst. What is the right use? What is the one end, which all

                   means go to effect? They are for nothing but to inspire. I had better never see a book, than to be warped by its

                   attraction clean out of my own orbit, and made a satellite instead of a system. The one thing in the world, of value, is

                   the active soul. This every man is entitled to; this every man contains within him, although, in almost all men,

                   obstructed, and as yet unborn. The soul active sees absolute truth; and utters truth, or creates. In this action, it is

                   genius; not the privilege of here and there a favorite, but the sound estate of every man. In its essence, it is

                   progressive. The book, the college, the school of art, the institution of any kind, stop with some past utterance of

                   genius. This is good, say they, — let us hold by this. They pin me down. They look backward and not forward. But

                   genius looks forward: the eyes of man are set in his forehead, not in his hindhead: man hopes: genius creates.

                   Whatever talents may be, if the man create not, the pure efflux of the Deity is not his; — cinders and smoke there may

                   be, but not yet flame. There are creative manners, there are creative actions, and creative words; manners, actions,

                   words, that is, indicative of no custom or authority, but springing spontaneous from the mind's own sense of good and

                   fair.

 

                   On the other part, instead of being its own seer, let it receive from another mind its truth, though it were in torrents of

                   light, without periods of solitude, inquest, and self-recovery, and a fatal disservice is done. Genius is always sufficiently

                   the enemy of genius by over influence. The literature of every nation bear me witness. The English dramatic poets

                   have Shakspearized now for two hundred years.

 

                   Undoubtedly there is a right way of reading, so it be sternly subordinated. Man Thinking must not be subdued by his

                   instruments. Books are for the scholar's idle times. When he can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be

                   wasted in other men's transcripts of their readings. But when the intervals of darkness come, as come they must, —

                   when the sun is hid, and the stars withdraw their shining, — we repair to the lamps which were kindled by their ray, to

                   guide our steps to the East again, where the dawn is. We hear, that we may speak. The Arabian proverb says, "A fig

                   tree, looking on a fig tree, becometh fruitful."

 

                   It is remarkable, the character of the pleasure we derive from the best books. They impress us with the conviction,

                   that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the verses of one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell,

                   of Dryden, with the most modern joy, — with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part caused by the abstraction of all

                   time from their verses. There is some awe mixed with the joy of our surprise, when this poet, who lived in some past

                   world, two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies close to my own soul, that which I also had wellnigh

                   thought and said. But for the evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of all minds, we

                   should suppose some preestablished harmony, some foresight of souls that were to be, and some preparation of stores

                   for their future wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay up food before death for the young grub they shall

                   never see.

 

                   I would not be hurried by any love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to underrate the Book. We all know,

                   that, as the human body can be nourished on any food, though it were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the

                   human mind can be fed by any knowledge. And great and heroic men have existed, who had almost no other

                   information than by the printed page. I only would say, that it needs a strong head to bear that diet. One must be an

                   inventor to read well. As the proverb says, "He that would bring home the wealth of the Indies, must carry out the

                   wealth of the Indies." There is then creative reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and

                   invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with manifold allusion. Every sentence is doubly

                   significant, and the sense of our author is as broad as the world. We then see, what is always true, that, as the seer's

                   hour of vision is short and rare among heavy days and months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume.

                   The discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakspeare, only that least part, — only the authentic utterances of the oracle;

                   — all the rest he rejects, were it never so many times Plato's and Shakspeare's.

 

                   Of course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man. History and exact science he must learn by

                   laborious reading. Colleges, in like manner, have their indispensable office, — to teach elements. But they can only

                   highly serve us, when they aim not to drill, but to create; when they gather from far every ray of various genius to

                   their hospitable halls, and, by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on flame. Thought and knowledge

                   are natures in which apparatus and pretension avail nothing. Gowns, and pecuniary foundations, though of towns of

                   gold, can never countervail the least sentence or syllable of wit. Forget this, and our American colleges will recede in

                   their public importance, whilst they grow richer every year.

 

                   III. There goes in the world a notion, that the scholar should be a recluse, a valetudinarian, — as unfit for any

                   handiwork or public labor, as a penknife for an axe. The so-called `practical men' sneer at speculative men, as if,

                   because they speculate or see, they could do nothing. I have heard it said that the clergy, — who are always, more

                   universally than any other class, the scholars of their day, — are addressed as women; that the rough, spontaneous

                   conversation of men they do not hear, but only a mincing and diluted speech. They are often virtually disfranchised;

                   and, indeed, there are advocates for their celibacy. As far as this is true of the studious classes, it is not just and wise.

                   Action is with the scholar subordinate, but it is essential. Without it, he is not yet man. Without it, thought can never

                   ripen into truth. Whilst the world hangs before the eye as a cloud of beauty, we cannot even see its beauty. Inaction is

                   cowardice, but there can be no scholar without the heroic mind. The preamble of thought, the transition through which

                   it passes from the unconscious to the conscious, is action. Only so much do I know, as I have lived. Instantly we know

                   whose words are loaded with life, and whose not.

 

                   The world, — this shadow of the soul, or other me, lies wide around. Its attractions are the keys which unlock my

                   thoughts and make me acquainted with myself. I run eagerly into this resounding tumult. I grasp the hands of those

                   next me, and take my place in the ring to suffer and to work, taught by an instinct, that so shall the dumb abyss be

                   vocal with speech. I pierce its order; I dissipate its fear; I dispose of it within the circuit of my expanding life. So much

                   only of life as I know by experience, so much of the wilderness have I vanquished and planted, or so far have I

                   extended my being, my dominion. I do not see how any man can afford, for the sake of his nerves and his nap, to spare

                   any action in which he can partake. It is pearls and rubies to his discourse. Drudgery, calamity, exasperation, want, are

                   instructers in eloquence and wisdom. The true scholar grudges every opportunity of action past by, as a loss of power.

 

                   It is the raw material out of which the intellect moulds her splendid products. A strange process too, this, by which

                   experience is converted into thought, as a mulberry leaf is converted into satin. The manufacture goes forward at all

                   hours.

 

                   The actions and events of our childhood and youth, are now matters of calmest observation. They lie like fair pictures

                   in the air. Not so with our recent actions, — with the business which we now have in hand. On this we are quite unable

                   to speculate. Our affections as yet circulate through it. We no more feel or know it, than we feel the feet, or the hand, or

                   the brain of our body. The new deed is yet a part of life, — remains for a time immersed in our unconscious life. In

                   some contemplative hour, it detaches itself from the life like a ripe fruit, to become a thought of the mind. Instantly, it

                   is raised, transfigured; the corruptible has put on incorruption. Henceforth it is an object of beauty, however base its

                   origin and neighborhood. Observe, too, the impossibility of antedating this act. In its grub state, it cannot fly, it cannot

                   shine, it is a dull grub. But suddenly, without observation, the selfsame thing unfurls beautiful wings, and is an angel of

                   wisdom. So is there no fact, no event, in our private history, which shall not, sooner or later, lose its adhesive, inert

                   form, and astonish us by soaring from our body into the empyrean. Cradle and infancy, school and playground, the fear

                   of boys, and dogs, and ferules, the love of little maids and berries, and many another fact that once filled the whole sky,

                   are gone already; friend and relative, profession and party, town and country, nation and world, must also soar and

                   sing.

 

                   Of course, he who has put forth his total strength in fit actions, has the richest return of wisdom. I will not shut myself

                   out of this globe of action, and transplant an oak into a flower-pot, there to hunger and pine; nor trust the revenue of

                   some single faculty, and exhaust one vein of thought, much like those Savoyards, who, getting their livelihood by

                   carving shepherds, shepherdesses, and smoking Dutchmen, for all Europe, went out one day to the mountain to find

                   stock, and discovered that they had whittled up the last of their pine-trees. Authors we have, in numbers, who have

                   written out their vein, and who, moved by a commendable prudence, sail for Greece or Palestine, follow the trapper

                   into the prairie, or ramble round Algiers, to replenish their merchantable stock.

 

                   If it were only for a vocabulary, the scholar would be covetous of action. Life is our dictionary. Years are well spent in

                   country labors; in town, — in the insight into trades and manufactures; in frank intercourse with many men and

                   women; in science; in art; to the one end of mastering in all their facts a language by which to illustrate and embody our

                   perceptions. I learn immediately from any speaker how much he has already lived, through the poverty or the

                   splendor of his speech. Life lies behind us as the quarry from whence we get tiles and copestones for the masonry of

                   to-day. This is the way to learn grammar. Colleges and books only copy the language which the field and the work-yard

                   made.

 

                   But the final value of action, like that of books, and better than books, is, that it is a resource. That great principle of

                   Undulation in nature, that shows itself in the inspiring and expiring of the breath; in desire and satiety; in the ebb and

                   flow of the sea; in day and night; in heat and cold; and as yet more deeply ingrained in every atom and every fluid, is

                   known to us under the name of Polarity, — these "fits of easy transmission and reflection," as Newton called them, are

                   the law of nature because they are the law of spirit.

 

                   The mind now thinks; now acts; and each fit reproduces the other. When the artist has exhausted his materials, when

                   the fancy no longer paints, when thoughts are no longer apprehended, and books are a weariness, — he has always the

                   resource to live. Character is higher than intellect. Thinking is the function. Living is the functionary. The stream

                   retreats to its source. A great soul will be strong to live, as well as strong to think. Does he lack organ or medium to

                   impart his truths? He can still fall back on this elemental force of living them. This is a total act. Thinking is a partial

                   act. Let the grandeur of justice shine in his affairs. Let the beauty of affection cheer his lowly roof. Those 'far from

                   fame,' who dwell and act with him, will feel the force of his constitution in the doings and passages of the day better

                   than it can be measured by any public and designed display. Time shall teach him, that the scholar loses no hour which

                   the man lives. Herein he unfolds the sacred germ of his instinct, screened from influence. What is lost in seemliness is

                   gained in strength. Not out of those, on whom systems of education have exhausted their culture, comes the helpful

                   giant to destroy the old or to build the new, but out of unhandselled savage nature, out of terrible Druids and

                   Berserkirs, come at last Alfred and Shakspeare.

 

                   I hear therefore with joy whatever is beginning to be said of the dignity and necessity of labor to every citizen. There is

                   virtue yet in the hoe and the spade, for learned as well as for unlearned hands. And labor is everywhere welcome;

                   always we are invited to work; only be this limitation observed, that a man shall not for the sake of wider activity

                   sacrifice any opinion to the popular judgments and modes of action.

 

                   I have now spoken of the education of the scholar by nature, by books, and by action. It remains to say somewhat of

                   his duties.

 

                   They are such as become Man Thinking. They may all be comprised in self-trust. The office of the scholar is to cheer,

                   to raise, and to guide men by showing them facts amidst appearances. He plies the slow, unhonored, and unpaid task of

                   observation. Flamsteed and Herschel, in their glazed observatories, may catalogue the stars with the praise of all men,

                   and, the results being splendid and useful, honor is sure. But he, in his private observatory, cataloguing obscure and

                   nebulous stars of the human mind, which as yet no man has thought of as such, — watching days and months,

                   sometimes, for a few facts; correcting still his old records; — must relinquish display and immediate fame. In the long

                   period of his preparation, he must betray often an ignorance and shiftlessness in popular arts, incurring the disdain of

                   the able who shoulder him aside. Long he must stammer in his speech; often forego the living for the dead. Worse yet,

                   he must accept, — how often! poverty and solitude. For the ease and pleasure of treading the old road, accepting the

                   fashions, the education, the religion of society, he takes the cross of making his own, and, of course, the self-accusation,

                   the faint heart, the frequent uncertainty and loss of time, which are the nettles and tangling vines in the way of the

                   self-relying and self-directed; and the state of virtual hostility in which he seems to stand to society, and especially to

                   educated society. For all this loss and scorn, what offset? He is to find consolation in exercising the highest functions of

                   human nature. He is one, who raises himself from private considerations, and breathes and lives on public and

                   illustrious thoughts. He is the world's eye. He is the world's heart. He is to resist the vulgar prosperity that retrogrades

                   ever to barbarism, by preserving and communicating heroic sentiments, noble biographies, melodious verse, and the

                   conclusions of history. Whatsoever oracles the human heart, in all emergencies, in all solemn hours, has uttered as its

                   commentary on the world of actions, — these he shall receive and impart. And whatsoever new verdict Reason from

                   her inviolable seat pronounces on the passing men and events of to-day, — this he shall hear and promulgate.

 

                   These being his functions, it becomes him to feel all confidence in himself, and to defer never to the popular cry. He and

                   he only knows the world. The world of any moment is the merest appearance. Some great decorum, some fetish of a

                   government, some ephemeral trade, or war, or man, is cried up by half mankind and cried down by the other half, as if

                   all depended on this particular up or down. The odds are that the whole question is not worth the poorest thought

                   which the scholar has lost in listening to the controversy. Let him not quit his belief that a popgun is a popgun, though

                   the ancient and honorable of the earth affirm it to be the crack of doom. In silence, in steadiness, in severe abstraction,

                   let him hold by himself; add observation to observation, patient of neglect, patient of reproach; and bide his own time,

                   — happy enough, if he can satisfy himself alone, that this day he has seen something truly. Success treads on every

                   right step. For the instinct is sure, that prompts him to tell his brother what he thinks. He then learns, that in going

                   down into the secrets of his own mind, he has descended into the secrets of all minds. He learns that he who has

                   mastered any law in his private thoughts, is master to that extent of all men whose language he speaks, and of all into

                   whose language his own can be translated. The poet, in utter solitude remembering his spontaneous thoughts and

                   recording them, is found to have recorded that, which men in crowded cities find true for them also. The orator

                   distrusts at first the fitness of his frank confessions, — his want of knowledge of the persons he addresses, — until he

                   finds that he is the complement of his hearers; — that they drink his words because he fulfils for them their own

                   nature; the deeper he dives into his privatest, secretest presentiment, to his wonder he finds, this is the most

                   acceptable, most public, and universally true. The people delight in it; the better part of every man feels, This is my

                   music; this is myself.

 

                   In self-trust, all the virtues are comprehended. Free should the scholar be, — free and brave. Free even to the

                   definition of freedom, "without any hindrance that does not arise out of his own constitution." Brave; for fear is a thing,

                   which a scholar by his very function puts behind him. Fear always springs from ignorance. It is a shame to him if his

                   tranquillity, amid dangerous times, arise from the presumption, that, like children and women, his is a protected class;

                   or if he seek a temporary peace by the diversion of his thoughts from politics or vexed questions, hiding his head like

                   an ostrich in the flowering bushes, peeping into microscopes, and turning rhymes, as a boy whistles to keep his courage

                   up. So is the danger a danger still; so is the fear worse. Manlike let him turn and face it. Let him look into its eye and

                   search its nature, inspect its origin, — see the whelping of this lion, — which lies no great way back; he will then find in

                   himself a perfect comprehension of its nature and extent; he will have made his hands meet on the other side, and can

                   henceforth defy it, and pass on superior. The world is his, who can see through its pretension. What deafness, what

                   stone-blind custom, what overgrown error you behold, is there only by sufferance, — by your sufferance. See it to be a

                   lie, and you have already dealt it its mortal blow.

 

                   Yes, we are the cowed, — we the trustless. It is a mischievous notion that we are come late into nature; that the world

                   was finished a long time ago. As the world was plastic and fluid in the hands of God, so it is ever to so much of his

                   attributes as we bring to it. To ignorance and sin, it is flint. They adapt themselves to it as they may; but in proportion

                   as a man has any thing in him divine, the firmament flows before him and takes his signet and form. Not he is great

                   who can alter matter, but he who can alter my state of mind. They are the kings of the world who give the color of their

                   present thought to all nature and all art, and persuade men by the cheerful serenity of their carrying the matter, that

                   this thing which they do, is the apple which the ages have desired to pluck, now at last ripe, and inviting nations to the

                   harvest. The great man makes the great thing. Wherever Macdonald sits, there is the head of the table. Linnaeus

                   makes botany the most alluring of studies, and wins it from the farmer and the herb-woman; Davy, chemistry; and

                   Cuvier, fossils. The day is always his, who works in it with serenity and great aims. The unstable estimates of men

                   crowd to him whose mind is filled with a truth, as the heaped waves of the Atlantic follow the moon.

 

                   For this self-trust, the reason is deeper than can be fathomed, — darker than can be enlightened. I might not carry

                   with me the feeling of my audience in stating my own belief. But I have already shown the ground of my hope, in

                   adverting to the doctrine that man is one. I believe man has been wronged; he has wronged himself. He has almost lost

                   the light, that can lead him back to his prerogatives. Men are become of no account. Men in history, men in the world of

                   to-day are bugs, are spawn, and are called `the mass' and `the herd.' In a century, in a millennium, one or two men;

                   that is to say, — one or two approximations to the right state of every man. All the rest behold in the hero or the poet

                   their own green and crude being, — ripened; yes, and are content to be less, so that may attain to its full stature. What

                   a testimony, — full of grandeur, full of pity, is borne to the demands of his own nature, by the poor clansman, the poor

                   partisan, who rejoices in the glory of his chief. The poor and the low find some amends to their immense moral

                   capacity, for their acquiescence in a political and social inferiority. They are content to be brushed like flies from the

                   path of a great person, so that justice shall be done by him to that common nature which it is the dearest desire of all to

                   see enlarged and glorified. They sun themselves in the great man's light, and feel it to be their own element. They cast

                   the dignity of man from their downtrod selves upon the shoulders of a hero, and will perish to add one drop of blood to

                   make that great heart beat, those giant sinews combat and conquer. He lives for us, and we live in him.

 

                   Men such as they are, very naturally seek money or power; and power because it is as good as money, — the "spoils,"

                   so called, "of office." And why not? for they aspire to the highest, and this, in their sleep-walking, they dream is highest.

                   Wake them, and they shall quit the false good, and leap to the true, and leave governments to clerks and desks. This

                   revolution is to be wrought by the gradual domestication of the idea of Culture. The main enterprise of the world for

                   splendor, for extent, is the upbuilding of a man. Here are the materials strown along the ground. The private life of one

                   man shall be a more illustrious monarchy, — more formidable to its enemy, more sweet and serene in its influence to

                   its friend, than any kingdom in history. For a man, rightly viewed, comprehendeth the particular natures of all men.

                   Each philosopher, each bard, each actor, has only done for me, as by a delegate, what one day I can do for myself. The

                   books which once we valued more than the apple of the eye, we have quite exhausted. What is that but saying, that we

                   have come up with the point of view which the universal mind took through the eyes of one scribe; we have been that

                   man, and have passed on. First, one; then, another; we drain all cisterns, and, waxing greater by all these supplies, we

                   crave a better and more abundant food. The man has never lived that can feed us ever. The human mind cannot be

                   enshrined in a person, who shall set a barrier on any one side to this unbounded, unboundable empire. It is one central

                   fire, which, flaming now out of the lips of Etna, lightens the capes of Sicily; and, now out of the throat of Vesuvius,

                   illuminates the towers and vineyards of Naples. It is one light which beams out of a thousand stars. It is one soul which

                   animates all men.

 

                   But I have dwelt perhaps tediously upon this abstraction of the Scholar. I ought not to delay longer to add what I have

                   to say, of nearer reference to the time and to this country.

 

                   Historically, there is thought to be a difference in the ideas which predominate over successive epochs, and there are

                   data for marking the genius of the Classic, of the Romantic, and now of the Reflective or Philosophical age. With the

                   views I have intimated of the oneness or the identity of the mind through all individuals, I do not much dwell on these

                   differences. In fact, I believe each individual passes through all three. The boy is a Greek; the youth, romantic; the

                   adult, reflective. I deny not, however, that a revolution in the leading idea may be distinctly enough traced.

 

                   Our age is bewailed as the age of Introversion. Must that needs be evil? We, it seems, are critical; we are embarrassed

                   with second thoughts; we cannot enjoy any thing for hankering to know whereof the pleasure consists; we are lined

                   with eyes; we see with our feet; the time is infected with Hamlet's unhappiness, —

 

                             "Sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought."

 

                   Is it so bad then? Sight is the last thing to be pitied. Would we be blind? Do we fear lest we should outsee nature and

                   God, and drink truth dry? I look upon the discontent of the literary class, as a mere announcement of the fact, that

                   they find themselves not in the state of mind of their fathers, and regret the coming state as untried; as a boy dreads

                   the water before he has learned that he can swim. If there is any period one would desire to be born in, — is it not the

                   age of Revolution; when the old and the new stand side by side, and admit of being compared; when the energies of all

                   men are searched by fear and by hope; when the historic glories of the old, can be compensated by the rich possibilities

                   of the new era? This time, like all times, is a very good one, if we but know what to do with it.

 

                   I read with joy some of the auspicious signs of the coming days, as they glimmer already through poetry and art,

                   through philosophy and science, through church and state.

 

                   One of these signs is the fact, that the same movement which effected the elevation of what was called the lowest class

                   in the state, assumed in literature a very marked and as benign an aspect. Instead of the sublime and beautiful; the

                   near, the low, the common, was explored and poetized. That, which had been negligently trodden under foot by those

                   who were harnessing and provisioning themselves for long journeys into far countries, is suddenly found to be richer

                   than all foreign parts. The literature of the poor, the feelings of the child, the philosophy of the street, the meaning of

                   household life, are the topics of the time. It is a great stride. It is a sign, — is it not? of new vigor, when the extremities

                   are made active, when currents of warm life run into the hands and the feet. I ask not for the great, the remote, the

                   romantic; what is doing in Italy or Arabia; what is Greek art, or Provencal minstrelsy; I embrace the common, I

                   explore and sit at the feet of the familiar, the low. Give me insight into to-day, and you may have the antique and

                   future worlds. What would we really know the meaning of? The meal in the firkin; the milk in the pan; the ballad in the

                   street; the news of the boat; the glance of the eye; the form and the gait of the body; — show me the ultimate reason of

                   these matters; show me the sublime presence of the highest spiritual cause lurking, as always it does lurk, in these

                   suburbs and extremities of nature; let me see every trifle bristling with the polarity that ranges it instantly on an

                   eternal law; and the shop, the plough, and the leger, referred to the like cause by which light undulates and poets sing;

                   — and the world lies no longer a dull miscellany and lumber-room, but has form and order; there is no trifle; there is no

                   puzzle; but one design unites and animates the farthest pinnacle and the lowest trench.

 

                   This idea has inspired the genius of Goldsmith, Burns, Cowper, and, in a newer time, of Goethe, Wordsworth, and

                   Carlyle. This idea they have differently followed and with various success. In contrast with their writing, the style of

                   Pope, of Johnson, of Gibbon, looks cold and pedantic. This writing is blood-warm. Man is surprised to find that things

                   near are not less beautiful and wondrous than things remote. The near explains the far. The drop is a small ocean. A

                   man is related to all nature. This perception of the worth of the vulgar is fruitful in discoveries. Goethe, in this very

                   thing the most modern of the moderns, has shown us, as none ever did, the genius of the ancients.

 

                   There is one man of genius, who has done much for this philosophy of life, whose literary value has never yet been

                   rightly estimated; — I mean Emanuel Swedenborg. The most imaginative of men, yet writing with the precision of a

                   mathematician, he endeavored to engraft a purely philosophical Ethics on the popular Christianity of his time. Such an

                   attempt, of course, must have difficulty, which no genius could surmount. But he saw and showed the connection

                   between nature and the affections of the soul. He pierced the emblematic or spiritual character of the visible, audible,

                   tangible world. Especially did his shade-loving muse hover over and interpret the lower parts of nature; he showed the

                   mysterious bond that allies moral evil to the foul material forms, and has given in epical parables a theory of isanity, of

                   beasts, of unclean and fearful things.

 

                   Another sign of our times, also marked by an analogous political movement, is, the new importance given to the single

                   person. Every thing that tends to insulate the individual, — to surround him with barriers of natural respect, so that

                   each man shall feel the world is his, and man shall treat with man as a sovereign state with a sovereign state; — tends

                   to true union as well as greatness. "I learned," said the melancholy Pestalozzi, "that no man in God's wide earth is

                   either willing or able to help any other man." Help must come from the bosom alone. The scholar is that man who must

                   take up into himself all the ability of the time, all the contributions of the past, all the hopes of the future. He must be

                   an university of knowledges. If there be one lesson more than another, which should pierce his ear, it is, The world is

                   nothing, the man is all; in yourself is the law of all nature, and you know not yet how a globule of sap ascends; in

                   yourself slumbers the whole of Reason; it is for you to know all, it is for you to dare all. Mr. President and Gentlemen,

                   this confidence in the unsearched might of man belongs, by all motives, by all prophecy, by all preparation, to the

                   American Scholar. We have listened too long to the courtly muses of Europe. The spirit of the American freeman is

                   already suspected to be timid, imitative, tame. Public and private avarice make the air we breathe thick and fat. The

                   scholar is decent, indolent, complaisant. See already the tragic consequence. The mind of this country, taught to aim at

                   low objects, eats upon itself. There is no work for any but the decorous and the complaisant. Young men of the fairest

                   promise, who begin life upon our shores, inflated by the mountain winds, shined upon by all the stars of God, find the

                   earth below not in unison with these, — but are hindered from action by the disgust which the principles on which

                   business is managed inspire, and turn drudges, or die of disgust, — some of them suicides. What is the remedy? They

                   did not yet see, and thousands of young men as hopeful now crowding to the barriers for the career, do not yet see,

                   that, if the single man plant himself indomitably on his instincts, and there abide, the huge world will come round to

                   him. Patience, — patience; — with the shades of all the good and great for company; and for solace, the perspective of

                   your own infinite life; and for work, the study and the communication of principles, the making those instincts

                   prevalent, the conversion of the world. Is it not the chief disgrace in the world, not to be an unit; — not to be reckoned

                   one character; — not to yield that peculiar fruit which each man was created to bear, but to be reckoned in the gross, in

                   the hundred, or the thousand, of the party, the section, to which we belong; and our opinion predicted geographically,

                   as the north, or the south? Not so, brothers and friends, — please God, ours shall not be so. We will walk on our own

                   feet; we will work with our own hands; we will speak our own minds. The study of letters shall be no longer a name for

                   pity, for doubt, and for sensual indulgence. The dread of man and the love of man shall be a wall of defence and a

                   wreath of joy around all. A nation of men will for the first time exist, because each believes himself inspired by the

                   Divine Soul which also inspires all men.